Jack Clark 谈奇点之后的原创价值与故事想象
我在The Curve 活动上听到的最有用的观点是“即使在奇点之后，我们仍然可以抢劫蒙娜丽莎”。这里有一个微妙/重要的观点，即有些东西（例如，独一无二、因其原件身份而有价值的物品）即使在一切都改变的情况下，也会保持/增长价值。
这也只是一个直接了不起的写作提示——在后奇点未来偷东西意味着什么？团队是谁？安全系统是什么样的？警察是如何运作的？很棒的内容！会议是查塔姆研究所规则，所以我不能说出是谁说的。
为了清楚到令人痛苦的地步，这个引用的背景是人们在谈论想象未来的事情，并指出尽管奇点令人困惑，但我们可以想象超越它的东西——比如抢劫案。
对照原文
The single most useful take I heard at The Curve was "we can still heist the Mona Lisa after the singularity". There's a subtle/important point here, where some things (e.g, n of 1 goods where originally is valuable) will retain/grow in value even as everything changes.
This is also just a straight up great writing prompt - what would it mean to steal something in a post-singularity future? Who is the team? What are the security systems? How do the police work? great stuff! Session was chatham house so I can't name who said it.
To be agonizingly clear, the context of this quote was people talking about imagining things in the future, and noting that even though the singularity is confusing, it's possible to imagine things beyond it - like heists.