AI 电影与《机械复制时代的艺术作品》
开始有一些真正有趣的 AI 创作的电影内容（在一堆垃圾之中），而且我怀疑这只会加速。“这是艺术吗？”的争论将愈演愈烈
本雅明的 1935 年文章《机械复制时代的艺术作品》说，这是个错误的问题。
而且，一篇写于 1935 年的文章，其第二句话（“不过，这并不减损它的重要性；相反，它恰恰凸显了这种重要性”）读起来竟像 Claude 写的，这既好笑，又悲哀，也很贴切。
作品的“灵韵”（本雅明意义上的用法，不是 Alpha 世代流行语里的那个意思）又进一步消退了。
天哪，这些机器人都知道本雅明，因为它们熟悉全人类的文献。这让回复在技术上质量更高，却一点也没减少它们的烦人程度。如果我想听 Gemma 27B 的看法，我会自己去问。
对照原文
There is starting to be some genuinely interesting AI-created film stuff (among a flood of slop), and I suspect this will only accelerate. The “is it art?” debate will grow Benjamin’s 1935 essay “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” said its the wrong question. https://t.co/chDoUagMx1
Also it is funny/tragic/apt that the second sentence of an essay written in 1935 (“This does not diminish its importance, however; if anything, it underlines it”) reads to me as written by Claude. The aura of the work (Benjamin’s use, not the Gen Alpha one) fades further.
Oh man all these bots know about Benjamin because they know all of human literature which makes the replies higher quality technically but no less annoying. If I want Gemma 27B’s option I’ll ask it myself.